Users:General FEM Analysis/Materials Reference/Puck Failure Criterion
From Carat++ Public Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
In order to judge if a stress vector on the stress spce is leading to damage, a mathematical expression is needed. | In order to judge if a stress vector on the stress spce is leading to damage, a mathematical expression is needed. | ||
This expression is called ''fracture condition'' an is written as the following general form: | This expression is called ''fracture condition'' an is written as the following general form: | ||
− | [[File:Formel3.4.png]] | + | [[File:Formel3.4.png|150px]] |
− | [[File:sigma_i.png| | + | [[File:sigma_i.png|40px]] : Components of stress vector |
Ri : Strengths under corresponding stresses | Ri : Strengths under corresponding stresses | ||
F : Fracture function | F : Fracture function |
Revision as of 07:29, 15 February 2013
Contents |
General Description
It is based on Mohr‘s fracture hypothesis which is appropriate for brittle fracture behaviour of composite materials. It can distinguish between fibre fracture and different inter-fibre fracture. Both 2D and 3D formulations are implemented into Carat++. Available fracture modes for 2D Puck Criterion are:
- Fibre Fracture (FF)
- Inter Fibre Fracture Mode A (IFF A)
- Inter Fibre Fracture Mode B (IFF B)
- Inter Fibre Fracture Mode C (IFF C)
Available fracture modes for 3D Puck Criterion are:
- Fibre Fracture (FF)
- Inter Fibre Fracture (IFF)
Stresses on the Fracture Plane
Strength Analysis
In order to judge if a stress vector on the stress spce is leading to damage, a mathematical expression is needed. This expression is called fracture condition an is written as the following general form: : Components of stress vector Ri : Strengths under corresponding stresses F : Fracture function
Parameter Description
Example of a Complete Input Block
Whos here now: Members 0 Guests 0 Bots & Crawlers 1 |