Users:General FEM Analysis/Materials Reference/Puck Failure Criterion
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
F < 1 : no fracture | F < 1 : no fracture | ||
+ | |||
F = 1 : fracture limit reached and fracture occurs | F = 1 : fracture limit reached and fracture occurs | ||
+ | |||
F > 1 : fracture limit exceeded | F > 1 : fracture limit exceeded | ||
− | with F | + | |
+ | with F [[File:Element.png|10px]] [0,[[File:unendlich.png|18px]]) | ||
[[File:puck.png|1000px]] | [[File:puck.png|1000px]] |
Revision as of 07:55, 15 February 2013
Contents |
General Description
It is based on Mohr‘s fracture hypothesis which is appropriate for brittle fracture behaviour of composite materials. It can distinguish between fibre fracture and different inter-fibre fracture. Both 2D and 3D formulations are implemented into Carat++. Available fracture modes for 2D Puck Criterion are:
- Fibre Fracture (FF)
- Inter Fibre Fracture Mode A (IFF A)
- Inter Fibre Fracture Mode B (IFF B)
- Inter Fibre Fracture Mode C (IFF C)
Available fracture modes for 3D Puck Criterion are:
- Fibre Fracture (FF)
- Inter Fibre Fracture (IFF)
Stresses on the Fracture Plane
Strength Analysis
In order to judge if a stress vector on the stress spce is leading to damage, a mathematical expression is needed. This expression is called fracture condition an is written as the following general form:
Ri. : Strengths under corresponding stresses
F : Fracture function
There are 6 main strengths that should be related to the occurring stress state:
F < 1 : no fracture
F = 1 : fracture limit reached and fracture occurs
F > 1 : fracture limit exceeded
Parameter Description
Example of a Complete Input Block
Whos here now: Members 0 Guests 0 Bots & Crawlers 1 |